Categories: Protect Your Identity

New proposal allows nursing homes to force residents to give up legal rights

  | 
Team Clark is adamant that we will never write content influenced by or paid for by an advertiser. To support our work, we do make money from some links to companies and deals on our site. Learn more about our guarantee here.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed major revisions to a rule that was meant to protect your elderly loved ones from nursing home abuses.

It’s disturbing to think about, but abuse, theft and neglect does happen in long-term care facilities.

Read more: This major health insurer may stop paying your ER bill on July 1

Proposed changes to nursing home arbitration rule

A recent CNN investigation revealed widespread sexual abuse and assault in nursing homes. It reports that more than 1,000 nursing homes have been cited for mishandling alleged cases of sexual abuse.

Last year, CMS finalized a rule that banned long-term care facilities from forcing patients and their families to sign pre-dispute arbitration agreements.

Additionally, residents couldn’t be required to sign an arbitration agreement as a condition of their initial admission.

When patients sign an arbitration agreement, they give up their rights to a day in court in the event that there’s some type of dispute, such as one over abuse.

The finalized rule hadn’t gone into effect due to legal challenges from the long-term care industry, which prefers arbitration because it’s typically quicker and less costly than lawsuits.

Now, this new proposal would erase much of what was in the finalized rule, including the arbitration ban. It reads, in part:

Specifically, we propose to remove the requirement precluding facilities from entering into pre-dispute agreements for binding arbitration with any resident or resident’s representative, which we do not believe strikes the best balance between the advantages and disadvantages of pre-dispute arbitration. For the same reason, we also propose removing the prohibition banning facilities from requiring that residents sign arbitration agreements as a condition of admission to a facility. And, we propose removing the provisions regarding the terms of arbitration agreements.

The proposal maintains it will protect the interests of long-term care residents by requiring that arbitration agreements are in plain language so that they’re easily understood.

CMS is accepting public comments on this matter through August 7.

Clark encourages you to make your voice heard on this issue. To do so, follow this direct link or go to http://www.regulations.gov and enter file code CMS-3342-P into the search bar.

Listen to Clark talk about the issue on The Clark Howard Show Podcast

Read more: Doctor reveals the 10 foods he never eats

 

This post was last modified on June 8, 2017 3:54 pm

Recent Posts

Don’t Make This Mistake if You’re Going to a Destination Wedding

Being invited to a destination wedding can be a celebratory affair for all involved, but…

2 days ago

5 Things To Know About the PNC Cash Unlimited® Visa Signature® Credit Card

Are you looking for a good cash back credit card with no annual fee? The…

2 days ago

My 401(k) Just Moved to an Insurance Company. What Should I Do?

A 401(k) plan is one of the best benefits you can receive as a full-time…

5 days ago

Drivers Beware: Watch Out for This Toll Notice Scam

A recent warning from the federal authorities cautions drivers to be on the lookout for…

5 days ago

What Do I Do If I Have a Connecting Flight With a Short Layover?

Even if you're a travel veteran, the thought of sprinting through the airport with your…

1 week ago

Should You Stay With Vanguard Despite the New Fee Announcement?

Vanguard, one of Team Clark's favorite brokerage firms, recently announced to its customers several "junk…

1 week ago