Team Clark is adamant that we will never write content influenced by or paid for by an advertiser. To support our work, we do make money from some links to companies and deals on our site. Learn more about our guarantee here.
Remember the “pink slime” debacle of a few years ago?
It’s ready to come roaring back into the spotlight thanks a new court decision!
Read more: Taking a hot bath may burn as many calories as a 30-minute walk
Back in 2012, an ABC News report claimed that some 70% of ground beef sold in supermarkets had the so-called “pink slime” additive.
The story, which played out heavily on social media, effectively created a hostile environment for manufacturers of “lean finely textured beef,” as its proponents prefer to call it.
In fact, the outcry against “pink slime” was so intense that it effectively shut down some production of the food additive at that time.
Following the production moratorium, Beef Products Inc (BPI) brought a $5.7 billion defamation case against ABC News for coming up with the “pink slime” moniker and turning public opinion against its product.
The beef processor had been pushing to have its case heard by a jury, though ABC was hoping to settle without going to trial in front of jurors.
After a lot of legal scrimmaging back and forth, Reuters now reports that South Dakota’s highest court has ruled a trial can proceed as per BPI’s wishes.
Technically, pink slime is defined by Wikipedia as “a meat-based product used as a food additive to ground beef and beef-based processed meats, as a filler or to reduce the overall fat content of ground beef. In the production process, heat and centrifuges remove fat from the meat in beef trimmings. The resulting product is exposed to ammonia gas or citric acid to kill bacteria.”
Simply look for terms like “lean finely textured beef” (LFTB), “textured beef,” “finely textured beef” or “boneless lean beef trimmings” (BLBT).
“Finely textured beef” is perhaps the most common name for what would otherwise be called “pink slime” today, according to meat packer Cargill. The meat processor offers that juicy tidbit and more on the website GroundBeefAnswers.com.
Two years ago, beef prices were at historic highs as the cattle herd shrunk to a 63-year low. But that’s not the case now. Cattle counts are up and prices are dropping.
The average price for ground chuck is down to $3.54 a pound in February 2017 from $4.40 a pound just two years earlier, according to the latest figures from the USDA. That downward trend is expected to continue into the foreseeable future.
Yet even though beef is getting cheaper, some people have switched away from red meat for health reasons. If that sounds like you, here’s a list of 7 protein-packed foods that are cheaper than beef.
Read more: Your store-bought eggs are older than you think
This post was last modified on April 6, 2017 10:43 am
Deciding to save and invest are great habits. But once you check that box, your…
If you're considering subscribing to Fubo, you need to be comfortable missing out on some…
Are you looking for a way to earn 2% back on every purchase you make…
You're not alone if you're running a balance on your credit cards. Collectively, Americans are…
A big part of saving money comes down to knowing how to comparison shop. But…
If you work for a big company as a full-time employee, chances are you have…